Warrior General Games

Ok guys sorry for not posting last week's power rankings.

#1 San Jose SkyForce (5-0)
- After that a dominating game against the Eagles they continue to show how strong they are via crushing another soft team in the Hustlas.

#2 Fredericksburg Cavaliers (5-0)
- These team is continuing to prove that they deserve the #2 ranking.

#3 Indy Hellcats (5-0)
- In winning the third of their four straight games of tough competition, the Hellcats find themselves ranked at #3.

#4 Nic Cage 4-Ever <3 (4-1)
- Looks like Nic Cage is back in form and find themselves still stuck at #4 because of the #2 and #3 are still undefeated.

#5 Minnesota Eagles (4-1), Springfield Patriots (4-1),
- These teams are just below Nic Cage but just like them they are ranked below because Hellcats and Cavaliers haven't lost yet.

#6 Holland Pinoy All Stars (3-2)
- Surprisingly the All Stars find themselves at #6 after that incredible game against the Hornets.

#7 Las Vegas Jokers (3-2)
- After two straight quality wins the Jokers find themselves at #7.

#8 Council Crest Bullmastiffs (3-2)
- That loss to the undefeated Hellcats dropped them a couple of ranks.

#9 St. James's Gate (2-3)
- This team continues to show that they can keep games close against the middle tier teams. If they can get a break or two they could find themselves at a pretty good ranking.

#10 Damascus Swarmin' Hornets (2-3)
- It was a surprising result on their last game that dropped the Hornets down 3 notches.

The Hellcats square off against the Cavs in the next game opening up some room for Nic Cage or Minnesota to get a foot in the door, because only one team (The Hellcats or The Cavaliers) will remain undefeated after the next game.

Hey can you base these rankings off who you think is the best and not just record? I do appreciate you doing them, but it's okay to have your bias on them and not just go off win/loss.

Originally posted by reggiefrom40
Hey can you base these rankings off who you think is the best and not just record? I do appreciate you doing them, but it's okay to have your bias on them and not just go off win/loss.

Isn't playoff position is based on win/loss records?

Originally posted by jdpbernal
Originally posted by reggiefrom40

Hey can you base these rankings off who you think is the best and not just record? I do appreciate you doing them, but it's okay to have your bias on them and not just go off win/loss.

Isn't playoff position is based on win/loss records?

If we want a list of teams in order of wins/losses we can just look at the league standings page.

Originally posted by stortiar
Originally posted by jdpbernal

Originally posted by reggiefrom40


Hey can you base these rankings off who you think is the best and not just record? I do appreciate you doing them, but it's okay to have your bias on them and not just go off win/loss.

Isn't playoff position is based on win/loss records?

If we want a list of teams in order of wins/losses we can just look at the league standings page.

Let me check...
Why did I put Cavaliers at #2, they played 3 soft teams and won. They played two good teams and won and are now 5-0.

Lets check your team, your team played 2 soft teams and won... Played an average team and won... Played two very good teams, won 1 and lost 1.

Does that mean I have to put your team at #2? Nope! I won't do that, this isn't the BCS shit where they rely on strength of schedule. As long as you win you move up the ranks, if you lose you move down.

Ok now lets look at another ranking... My team and Las Vegas Jokers.... I ranked my team ahead of the Jokers. Why? Here's how I see it.

Jokers played two good teams and lost, played three middle of the pack teams and won. My team had basically the same sched but looking closely at their common opponents my team won in a more convincing manner than the Jokers.

And lastly, if you don't like the bullshit that I post then don't read the thread!

OK! Didnt mean to get you upset!

you should always take the words of Kurl Russell with a pinch of salt, jd

You're doing fine with the predictions, though in the end I'm not so sure Fredericksburg will be better than Nic Cage.

Originally posted by reggiefrom40
You're doing fine with the predictions, though in the end I'm not so sure Fredericksburg will be better than Nic Cage.

I probably will agree with you on that but right now the Cavaliers are still undefeated so they get ranked ahead of Nic Cage.

This link can help you separate the ties:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/playoff_bracket.pl?league_id=47&conference_id=93

Originally posted by jdpbernal
Originally posted by reggiefrom40

You're doing fine with the predictions, though in the end I'm not so sure Fredericksburg will be better than Nic Cage.

I probably will agree with you on that but right now the Cavaliers are still undefeated so they get ranked ahead of Nic Cage.



Although I can't see you guys winning tomorrow night, your chemistry will go a long way toward how you'll finish this season.

Originally posted by reggiefrom40
Originally posted by jdpbernal

Originally posted by reggiefrom40


You're doing fine with the predictions, though in the end I'm not so sure Fredericksburg will be better than Nic Cage.

I probably will agree with you on that but right now the Cavaliers are still undefeated so they get ranked ahead of Nic Cage.



Although I can't see you guys winning tomorrow night, your chemistry will go a long way toward how you'll finish this season.

Its already obvious man, a team full of level 40ish players against a team full of level 20ish to a max of level 30 players.
No way my team can beat yours.

Good you guys will have laundry duty after the game...lol. You might have hotter cheerleaders though as we're searching for some good ones to throw up on the Web site.

Originally posted by reggiefrom40
Good you guys will have laundry duty after the game...lol. You might have hotter cheerleaders though as we're searching for some good ones to throw up on the Web site.

What the hell are you talking about? Your team is full of level 40's, its very obvious that you're going to beat us (and have beaten us).