You see a lot of guys with 30 vision around. Most soft cap. What happens if this additional vision check means you need 61? Anyone else a little nervous to see how these preseason games are going to go?
Forum > Position Talk > WR Club > So does the prospect of the new WR vision checks have anyone nervous/intrigued?
cmj33
offline
offline
Most really good CB's have vision at the second cap so this could be something to really keep an eye on. not too worried though tbqh.
Mob-6
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
djhoffman99
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mob-6
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
Interesting take, but what's the definition of a "bad pass". Rather, where is the line drawn between good and bad?
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
Interesting take, but what's the definition of a "bad pass". Rather, where is the line drawn between good and bad?
drakeborn
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mob-6
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
I see my receivers coming back for underthrown passes often enough. Will they still do so with lowish vision, is the question.
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
I see my receivers coming back for underthrown passes often enough. Will they still do so with lowish vision, is the question.
Granted86
offline
offline
Originally posted by drakeborn
Originally posted by Mob-6
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
I see my receivers coming back for underthrown passes often enough. Will they still do so with lowish vision, is the question.
thats where i THINK the vision check will be required, hopefully wr's with low vision wont be able to locate the ball in those cases
Originally posted by Mob-6
Originally posted by Mob-6
I'm not worried about vision unless they make the QB more erratic.
Yep, Bort said only on bad passes does it require the WR to make a vision check. Since I generally don't catch bad passes, who cares about vision.
I see my receivers coming back for underthrown passes often enough. Will they still do so with lowish vision, is the question.
thats where i THINK the vision check will be required, hopefully wr's with low vision wont be able to locate the ball in those cases
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
