Warrior General Games

which would you rather have? Break Tackle, then catch, then not fumble correct?

WTF are you talking about? What would you rather have, a plumber, a set of knitting needles or a copy of the US Constitution? Can you throw us a bone and put your question into some sort of context?

get over yourself. It's a simple question... They each have benefits...

Originally posted by mrmattregan
get over yourself. It's a simple question... They each have benefits...

Uhhm... you are the one asking for advice and he will probably give it to you.

your question is too vague.. you should post your build or give indication to what your receivers strengths are

yes, they all have benefits, but give greater benefits if it correlates with your build

Break tackle chance would probably be the best if you had high strength

If you are not dropping balls then the catching would be worthless right? same with the fumble

if you don't break tackles normally then break tackle chance would be kinda pointless right?

It wasn't a question for advice. It was a question asking for opinions...

any more smart ass remarks from the peanut gallary? and no break tackle chance wouldn't be pointless if you didn't break tackles normally, it would help you break them...

Originally posted by mrmattregan
It wasn't a question for advice. It was a question asking for opinions...

any more smart ass remarks from the peanut gallary? and no break tackle chance wouldn't be pointless if you didn't break tackles normally, it would help you break them...

Ok.. let's say you have 12 receptions or even 107(hypothetical) and you break none or even a few of the tackles.

We can take any reasonable number of break tackle chance... an example(15%)

Add 15% of our low percentage chance to our low percentage and you will still have a low percent chance. It will almost be the exact same as before. You won't notice a difference. When trying to improve a player adding something that really won't make much of a difference I deem it pointless. Most of the peanut gallery here that has at least half of a brain is going to agree.

Here is my general answer: Fumble chance seems kinda ( I'd rate it last) i don't see many recievers coughing the ball up much.

For a strength based receiver. I'd go: Break Tackle, then catch, then not fumble
For most builds that aren't strength I'd go: Catch Ball Chance, Break Tackle Chance, Not Fumble Chance
Let's say your WR has a 70% chance to catch a ball. at 10% catch ball chance it would come out to you having a 77% chance to catch a ball. this seems like it would be more beneficial than the other two options

Originally posted by Darrick213
Originally posted by mrmattregan

It wasn't a question for advice. It was a question asking for opinions...

any more smart ass remarks from the peanut gallary? and no break tackle chance wouldn't be pointless if you didn't break tackles normally, it would help you break them...

Ok.. let's say you have 12 receptions or even 107(hypothetical) and you break none or even a few of the tackles.

We can take any reasonable number of break tackle chance... an example(15%)

Add 15% of our low percentage chance to our low percentage and you will still have a low percent chance. It will almost be the exact same as before. You won't notice a difference. When trying to improve a player adding something that really won't make much of a difference I deem it pointless. Most of the peanut gallery here that has at least half of a brain is going to agree.

Here is my general answer: Fumble chance seems kinda ( I'd rate it last) i don't see many recievers coughing the ball up much.

For a strength based receiver. I'd go: Break Tackle, then catch, then not fumble
For most builds that aren't strength I'd go: Catch Ball Chance, Break Tackle Chance, Not Fumble Chance
Let's say your WR has a 70% chance to catch a ball. at 10% catch ball chance it would come out to you having a 77% chance to catch a ball. this seems like it would be more beneficial than the other two options


this is the kind of response's I was looking for... thank you.

Catch>No Fumbles>Break tackle.

But the real comparison goes like this

Movement (Spd/agi) > Catching > No Fumbles > Break tackles

The only reason not fumbling takes precedence over breaking tackles is it's defaulted there. Strength isn't as useful to a receiver as is carrying (at least in my opinion) and the primary function of carrying is holding on to the ball, breaking tackles is simply an additional benefit that comes with it and not something a receiver should really aim for.