Warrior General Games

I hope that the team that I play today loses miserably and that all of the people who are in my conference who are near my team in the standings lose by 100 points .. die die die .. die ..

I figured that was appropriate .. since only assholes are supposed to win games around here so some of you say.

I haven't been paying attention to the games here.

Is single back I being raped to it's utter death over here too?

Originally posted by caponesgun
I haven't been paying attention to the games here.

Is single back I being raped to it's utter death over here too?

Single back by definition is not an I form.

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Originally posted by caponesgun

I haven't been paying attention to the games here.

Is single back I being raped to it's utter death over here too?

Single back by definition is not an I form.

Yeah I was going to ask two different formations and combined them (i form and singleback)

I'm running on 0 zero sleep

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
I hope that the team that I play today loses miserably

Well, you got that...
not much we could do today

TOOK THE WORDS RIGHT OUT OF MY MOUTH RANDALL"I figured that was appropriate .. since only assholes are supposed to win games around here so some of you say."

OR YOUR A MIND READER, LOL.

YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED ONCE AGAIN RANDY!!!

Originally posted by millertime31

Well, you got that...
not much we could do today

Your WR tore it up
5 Rec, 182yds, 3 TD

Outside of him though yeah .. team was limited, but he was on fire!

Yep, he had a good day, but we would´ve needed all players on fire.
What´s left is to take the lesson and learn...

Originally posted by millertime31
Yep, he had a good day, but we would´ve needed all players on fire.
What´s left is to take the lesson and learn...

Kimbo needs to be a Cheetah imo

(yes, that again)

*yawn*

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
I hope that the team that I play today loses miserably and that all of the people who are in my conference who are near my team in the standings lose by 100 points .. die die die .. die ..

I figured that was appropriate .. since only assholes are supposed to win games around here so some of you say.

Yeah...but you lost one.

/case rested

Classic posting...

here is what i havent figured out yet...how does a speed/agility based DE hold up when you run at him and maul him...i think Bort has the whole DE/OT relationship fucked up beyond repair...maybe im off but here is what i think i see and hear...

1. Speed/Agility with lower Strength causes DEs to abuse OTs who have high STR/BLK and not enough Speed and Agility in the pass rush game.

2. If you watch replays of DEs zooming around OTs with much success that should equal SPD/AGI DE at work.

3. If you run at him with the same OT you should pancake his ass...

4. No. 3 doesnt seem to happen.

I also noticed today my QB was sacked a lot by blow blocking assignments on the blitz...Its a sad day when guys are left to run free when there are plenty of blockers to account for them.

Originally posted by dberner30
Classic posting...

here is what i havent figured out yet...how does a speed/agility based DE hold up when you run at him and maul him...i think Bort has the whole DE/OT relationship fucked up beyond repair...maybe im off but here is what i think i see and hear...

1. Speed/Agility with lower Strength causes DEs to abuse OTs who have high STR/BLK and not enough Speed and Agility in the pass rush game.

2. If you watch replays of DEs zooming around OTs with much success that should equal SPD/AGI DE at work.

3. If you run at him with the same OT you should pancake his ass...

4. No. 3 doesnt seem to happen.

I also noticed today my QB was sacked a lot by blow blocking assignments on the blitz...Its a sad day when guys are left to run free when there are plenty of blockers to account for them.

speed/agility DEs are the way to go. right now our starting DEs have 63 combined sacks and we are one of the top run d's in the league.

Teams rarely run when they are losing and beating up on Alpha doesnt mean anything .. pretty much every stat and whatever kind of comparison you want to make .. Alpha leads it .. of course thats because as I have always said ..

Alpha sucks!

The bottom 7 in Alpha are now less competitive this season, 3 are CPU teams, Minsk, Washington, GCP and Kazan are having depth/talent issues.

Also subtract all of the sacks from the minus yards and it wont be so awesome as you think ... getting 60 sacks against crappy Alpha teams .. eh .. we will scrim you again and beat you again .. but youd have excuses again.

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Teams rarely run when they are losing and beating up on Alpha doesnt mean anything .. pretty much every stat and whatever kind of comparison you want to make .. Alpha leads it .. of course thats because as I have always said ..

Alpha sucks!

The bottom 7 in Alpha are now less competitive this season, 3 are CPU teams, Minsk, Washington, GCP and Kazan are having depth/talent issues.

Also subtract all of the sacks from the minus yards and it wont be so awesome as you think ... getting 60 sacks against crappy Alpha teams .. eh .. we will scrim you again and beat you again .. but youd have excuses again.

The Bottom half of Zeta doesnt look too tough either. thats just the way it is.
Zeta only has 1 CPU team but they just beat a team that has an owner lol

So i wouldnt go as far to say that ALPHA sucks. yeah there are teams in both conferences that you could say shouldnt be in the PROS but that doesnt mean that the whole conference sucks.

i mean Minsk Ninjas beat Percival last season in the championship and Percival just beat you guys. Doesnt mean that either game would end up the same way next time around but the way i look at it in real games that were completely game planned for ALpha is on top lol.